With the move of SELAHATTIN Demirtas, his wife Basak Demirtas, whose candidacy for Istanbul was on the agenda, took a step back. She was forced to do that. Looking at the official statement, ordinary expressions such as PARTY INTEGRITY and FULL SUPPORT were used. When you decipher the lines, Selahattin Demirtas explains, “I am not against the party. I will not divide them. “I’m not your rival…” It wasn’t hard to see the meaning. So what was actually happening? What was the real truth behind chess? How would this reflect on Istanbul, Imamoglu, CHP, DEM? What was the big plan? Who was after what? Let’s see together. Let’s determine the names and roles and go…<\/p>\n
I think it was 2019. I think Minister Suleyman Soylu was making very important statements. He was in front of the media with extraordinary findings that not many people thought or focused on… “There is a conflict between Kandil and Ferhat Abdi Sahin. Kandil has a protection for Selahattin Demirtas. Kandil has an internal conflict at the Apo point. Syria Since Ferhat Abdi Sahin met with the USA during all the operations carried out in Turkiye, they have a stance against him. The USA is trying to legalize Sahin, but Kandil and HDP do not support him at all, it is an interesting situation… They should embrace a man who is trying to be legalized internationally, but they do not. This is my opinion. In Afrin, in the Olive Branch operation, Kandil immediately pulled the elements to put Ferhat Abdi Sahin in a difficult situation, they blamed the failure there on Abdi and tried to put forward such an evaluation both within the organization and in the public opinion that he could not manage the YPG. In the middle of this internal strife and conflict, Selahattin Demirtas, Apo and his derivatives are mentioned. For the first time, we see that a terrorist organization (PYD\/YPG) has come under the control of a state. It is controlled by the USA.<\/p>\n
The person Kandil invested in is Selahattin Demirtas. They are preparing Demirtas…” These were critical lines that stood out and explained the situation during a period when Turkiye lost years with the PKK. Because ANKARA did not understand the issue, it could not produce a solution for a very long time. It was unknowingly brought up to today when it could have solved the problem very early. This is what I’ve been writing for days anyway…<\/p>\n
Of course, there were important gaps that Soylu left. The issue had to be completely clarified. What the problem was and who it was had to be engraved in memories. Let’s go from former US President Trump… Let’s put the pieces in their place firmly… Known as “Sahin Cilo” but also known as “General Mazlum”, “Mustafa Abdi bin Halil”, “Ferhat Abdi Sahin”, “Mazlum Kobani” and ” The important figure of the PKK extension in Syria, who also goes by the name “Mazlum Abdi”, had the right to access the WHITE HOUSE. WHEN Trump was PRESIDENT, he announced that he would withdraw troops from the region and then sent a letter to President Erdogan. The subject of the letter was MAZLUM KOBANI. Talking about the economic threat, Trump said in his letter: “I have tried very hard to solve some of your problems.<\/p>\n