THE DEEP MAGAZINE IN EUROPE, Der Spiegel is out with the TRUMP cover again. Painting a rather pessimistic picture, the magazine talks about the danger awaiting EUROPE. And it is right… Stating that “If Trump is elected, the biggest change after the Second World War will occur,” Spiegel said, “Unforeseen threats await Europe. And more importantly, neither Germany nor France is ready for this! It is collapsing the existing alliances.”<\/p>\n
It undermines the security of Europe. It weakens the ties between them…” and continued… No matter how much time has passed, some still have difficulty understanding the incident. Europe, Germany and RUSSIA established energy brotherhood. EUROPE was gaining access to cheap gas, gaining the upper hand due to Russia’s raw material exports, and maintaining its presence as a player in the GLOBAL LEAGUE.<\/p>\n
Without asking anyone or fearing anyone, a hand came and blew up the Nord stream pipelines! Is it true? Yes. So who was harmed? GERMANY and the EUROPEAN UNION to be precise. Russia turned and sold to India what it would sell to China. So who did this? Weren’t the documents disclosed and the warnings of former and current US presidents all about the NORD STREAM! DON’T THEY ALL JUST SAY “end this collaboration”? Republicans, Democrats… They did. The aim here was to put RUSSIA as the OTHER against EUROPE. In fact, there was nothing they couldn’t share.<\/p>\n
However, the closeness between them only harmed the USA’s future plans. What did they do? They put UKRAINE in a straitjacket and took it to the field. They also gave an ACTION ORDER to Russia. So what happened? Ukraine was destroyed and EUROPE started to lose its competitiveness with the expensive energy it had to pay for. When the aid given to Kiev combined with inflation, tension skyrocketed. Perception of security collapsed. US sovereignty was recognized unconditionally. Saying “NATO is brain dead”, Macron went to Washington. Moscow’s nuclear threat was enough to make them all tremble with fear.<\/p>\n
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine clearly resulted in the EUROPEAN UNION giving up its GLOBAL CLAIMS! In any case, wars and important moves were made for BIG results. It meant that EUROPE was weakened and indirectly, CHINA, its BIGGEST TRADE PARTNER, also lost power. Because recently, the EU has been getting closer to China and overtaking the US-CHINA trade. This was a threat to Washington that had to be ended immediately. And so it was done. Now let’s look at what is happening in terms of MONEY, DOLLAR… The question is! What determines the reserve currency? The reserve currency had to be stable and secure. It must have features such as being a store of value and a way of exchange and must also be widely accepted. And of course, TO BE TRUSTED…<\/p>\n
IN ADDITION, the stability of the political system of the country that owns the reserve currency, the size of its economy, its prospects, the global integration of its markets, its transparency and openness, its hosting of a reliable legal system, the quality of the government debt, its ability to cover the costs related to the reserve currency, the size and depth and liquidity of the financial markets are a must! Is it true? Yes… Let’s continue…<\/p>\n
Even when viewed from this perspective, we had a chance to understand the struggle and the war! There were three players as RESERVE currencies as COMPETITORS against the US DOLLAR. These are EUROPE and EURO in the first place, Japan and Yen in second place, and England and Sterling in third place…<\/p>\n
Look! The global financial system relies on the stability of the dollar and the huge US trade deficit! This is the ultimate delicate balance! Countries such as China and Japan, which have a trade surplus, actually maintain the system by keeping the DOLLAR. They declare that they are not rivals to the DOLLAR! Once CHINA, which holds 3 percent of global reserves, challenged the DOLLAR, it would have to liberalize the YUAN. Such a relaxation would lead to the regulatory authority, namely the POLITBURO, reducing its ability to control credit and relinquishing any control over capital and the current account. The Chinese economy must be willing to change its colours to play the same role as the United States. So, was there such a move made by Beijing? On the contrary, practices that prioritize the STATE are increasing…<\/p>\n