Tension has skyrocketed in the region after the HAMAS attack on OCTOBER 7. Tel Aviv froze in the face of such a major operation. Then it rained death on others. This was also not unexpected. I’ve been writing what’s going on through my own point of view for days. What happened was too big and deep to fit into Gaza in terms of its results. I shared both the sides and the alliances. Let’s move today through MIT-MOSSAD explanations. There were many questions waiting for an answer! What was meant by them? Why was MIT showing its stance with a sharp answer? Where was the CIA? Was MI6 far from the incident? How would European intelligence agencies be involved in the developments? And was China a player in this equation?<\/p>\n
In line with the order received by Israeli intelligence, the important names of HAMAS will be targeted in TURKIYE-QATAR- LEBANON. In fact, the SECRET DECISION was leaked by Prime Minister Netanyahu. Thus, they declared that Turkiye was in a direct state of “CONFLICT” with the countries it was in. MIT is also reading this correctly and saying, “Don’t come! You will get hurt. You know us well…” They shared this clear message. They were openly warning Israel. So what would happen next?<\/p>\n
I looked at the October 7 attack and all the events that followed it as an operation to break the USA, ISRAEL from CHINA and England. The Tel Aviv administration was persistently staying close to Beijing and working together, especially in the technological field. Despite the warnings, they did not end this either. Netanyahu was a name that stood closer to London. For this reason, the CIA was sending hundreds of thousands of people to protest for “NETANYAHU’S RESIGNATION” and causing fights on the streets! Before October 7th!<\/p>\n
HAMAS was not just an organization. The Muslim Brotherhood had many components such as the British part, Turkiye’s support, Qatar’s power transfer, Iran’s support, and China’s help. In other words, it was not a stuck FORMATION that was left alone in the region. It was fighting both ISRAEL and the US in ISRAEL. That was the rough definition of the issue. Israel has been bombing GAZA for weeks. They killed thousands of people. And the equation has now come and it has been based on INTELLIGENCE WARS. Important names of HAMAS were to be liquidated in countries that supported HAMAS. THEY WERE TARGETED. Who says that? MOSSAD. So what does MIT say? “Don’t come, or the price it will be heavy…” So why was a STATE with the USA behind it, like Israel, explaining the OPERATION BY GIVING THE NAME OF THREE COUNTRIES. This was not reasonable. Intelligence would do its job, then the details would be learned. The method was different here! So why? What was wanted to be told? Let’s explain…<\/p>\n